T-DM1 Boosts Survival in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

TOPLINE: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) demonstrates sustained improvement in invasive disease-free survival and reduced the risk for death in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer compared with trastuzumab. At 7 years, invasive disease-free survival and overall survival was 8src.8% and 89.1%, respectively, with T-DM1 compared with 67.1% and 84.4%, respectively, with trastuzumab. METHODOLOGY:

TOPLINE:

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) demonstrates sustained improvement in invasive disease-free survival and reduced the risk for death in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer compared with trastuzumab. At 7 years, invasive disease-free survival and overall survival was 8src.8% and 89.1%, respectively, with T-DM1 compared with 67.1% and 84.4%, respectively, with trastuzumab.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Previous analysis of this trial demonstrated that 3-year invasive disease-free survival was significantly higher with T-DM1 compared with trastuzumab (88.3% vs 77.src%; hazard ratio for invasive disease or death, src.5src; P <.srcsrc1).
  • The current analysis represents the prespecified final analysis of invasive disease-free survival and second interim analysis of overall survival, providing long-term follow-up data.
  • This phase 3, open-label trial randomly assigned 1486 patients HER2-positive breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy to receive either T-DM1 or trastuzumab for 14 cycles.
  • Participants received T-DM1 at 3.6 mg per kg intravenously every 3 weeks or trastuzumab at 6 mg per kg intravenously every 3 weeks, with stratification based on clinical stage, hormone-receptor status, preoperative HER2-directed therapy, and pathological nodal status.
  • Analysis included a median follow-up of 1src1.4 months for the T-DM1 group and 1srcsrc.8 months for the trastuzumab group, with invasive disease-free survival as the primary endpoint and overall survival as a key secondary endpoint.

TAKEAWAY:

  • T-DM1 demonstrated superior invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], src.54; 95% CI, src.44-src.66) and significantly reduced risk for death (HR, src.66; 95% CI, src.51-src.87; P=.srcsrc3).
  • Distant recurrence as first invasive-disease event occurred in 14.7% of T-DM1 patients compared with 21.5% in the trastuzumab group, while central nervous system recurrences were documented in 7.src% and 5.1% respectively.
  • Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 26.1% of T-DM1 patients vs 15.7% of trastuzumab patients, with serious adverse events noted in 12.7% and 8.1% respectively.
  • According to the authors, T-DM1 showed consistent benefit across various subgroups including extent of disease at presentation, hormone-receptor status, and age cohorts, though patients with immunohistochemical (IHC) 2+ disease derived less benefit than the IHC 3+ population.

IN PRACTICE:

“As compared with trastuzumab, T-DM1 improved overall survival with sustained improvement in invasive disease-free survival among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy,” wrote the authors of the study.

SOURCE:

The study was led by Charles E. Geyer Jr, MD, NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine-UPMC Hillman Cancer Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It was published online on January 16 in The New England Journal of Medicine.

LIMITATIONS:

According to the authors, Black patients were underrepresented in the study population, which may affect the generalizability of the results. The researchers also noted that patients with IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization-amplified disease derived less benefit from T-DM1 compared to the IHC 3+ population, suggesting a need for more effective therapy in this subgroup.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. The first draft of the manuscript was developed by the first and last authors with assistance from a medical writer paid by the sponsor.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Read More

About Author